What type of power does a company officer demonstrate when issuing a reprimand for late report submission?

The correct answer reflects the concept of coercive or punishment power, which stems from the ability of an individual in a position of authority to enforce consequences for undesired behavior. When a company officer issues a reprimand for late report submission, they are exercising their authority to impose a negative consequence aimed at correcting or modifying behavior. This type of power is predicated on the premise that the officer can influence the behavior of their subordinates through the possibility of punishment, thereby reinforcing compliance with established standards and expectations.

In the context of organizational behavior and leadership, coercive power is a critical form of influence, especially in settings where adherence to rules and guidelines is essential for operational efficiency and safety. The act of reprimanding serves as a direct response to a violation of expectations, emphasizing accountability within the team.

The other types of power mentioned, while relevant to different scenarios, do not apply in this instance. Legitimate power relies on a formal position and authority to command, which does not inherently involve punishment or reprimanding. Reward power refers to the ability to provide incentives or rewards for desirable behavior, which is the opposite of what a reprimand signifies. Expert power is based on an individual's knowledge and skills, leading to influence through respect for expertise, rather than through disciplinary